Atheist Nexus

The World’s Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

Apparently you can't do polls on here.... but

Do any of you think that Jesus actually existed? What do category do you fall into?

A. Believed he existed, claims are false

B. Believed he existed, claims are exaggerated

C. Don't believe he existed

D. Believe he existed, claims are true (sorry had to leave the idiot category open)

Views: 746

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Pardon me?

Care to show me some of these many amazing paintings with "fireballs with people inside them"?
http://www.bibleufo.com/anapaint1.htm

This is just a website. My art history course professor had many more examples - and that was over 12 years ago. I'm sure more examples have been found since.

These kinds of things have shown up in cave paintings too.

Anyways, make of it what you will - I don't claim to know the truth, I only ask you to figure it out for yourself and never accept anyone's version of history on faith alone.

Good luck.
Consider for a moment what people imagined comets and meteor showers to look like up close before science told us what they were. Consider the many shapes and objects people saw in the stars.

Consider the idea many people held pertaining to the divinity of the sky, the realm of the Gods to some, the realm of heaven to the painters of most of those paintings.

All I see are religious objects, talismans, superstitious renditions of comets. To think it is all evidence of UFOs is contrived I'd say faced with easier explanations, but this of course is not going to make sense to you or the great truth you feel to be on the verge of uncovering or glimpsing. You really don't have much of a place among a forum of skeptics other than a shared opposing view to organized religion, but you're still trapped in the reasoning of the religious mind with the certainties you feel so strongly about. I don't mean to keep singling out your comments here, but it's really out of place and distracting from the topic.
I'm with Nick on this one. People, particularly ancient people with a lot less scientific explanation for 'stuff' than we have today, tend to see a conscious will in anything and everything. The sun and moon; deities. The stars; deities. A meteor; deities.

Or turn it around; "The spirit of god descends upon him/her/them/the event." How might one depict that? As a bright light source with a face descending down upon whatever.

Of course, I'm mostly saying this just to see if Matt VDB will take the pro-ufo-jesus side just so he doesn't have to agree with me.

(Sorry Matt - couldn't resist).
Hehe. I agree completely.

... oh god i just agreed with Nick. I think i need to go lie down

;)
Hey now! Why would agreeing with me strain you in any way, sir? The only thing I said in here was I thought it plausible Jesus could have never existed to give rise to what we know, and wished to see the evidence for it.

You then provided ample evidence to support a contrary view, and I proclaimed you had changed my mind in that I am open to the possibility the figure is based on an actual man, so what's with the need to lie down and the taking of the Tetragrammaton in vain, eh !?!?!?!

I mean, I thought I was a rational dude. *tear drop*
Oh my, my post above proves to me again that I shouldn't be posting at 1 AM. The joke was that agreeing with Jo Jerome would strain me, since we're engaged in several debates (always against each other) on topics of history. That's why he jokingly implied that I would surely pick the pro-UFO side here (again to disagree with him). My reply was that I wouldn't and so I probably needed to lie down.
Yet for some reason (too little sleep) I wrote Nick instead of Jo Jerome...

Wow, that joke really did bomb, didn't it?

My apologies to you, sir. Dry your tears ;)
Yipeeeeee! I can rest easy *wink wink*
Carry on then, good sir.
That's why he jokingly implied that I would surely pick the pro-UFO side here (again to disagree with him).

"Jo" sounds like a male variant to you?

Then I can put to rest any slightly paranoid wondering if part of the issue is my being female.
Does this mean you have been de-frocked instead of de-gened?

Sorry. Couldn't resist. And it's only 10 pm here. What I will be doing at 1 am is anyone's guess.
Woops.

Yes, as a matter of fact, where I'm from Jo is a male name (as well as a female one). Apologies.
Woops.

Yes, as a matter of fact, where I'm from Jo is a male name (as well as a female one). Apologies.


No worries. Didn't realize you're in Belgium. If it's any consolation, my online nick is taken from my would-be male name. Had I been a boy, Mom and Dad's chosen name was "Joseph Jerome."

I just took the female version 'Jo' (at least, here in the states), and use 'Jerome' as if it's a last name (to honor way-cool uncle Jerry).

Meanwhile, ran into the same snag myself years ago with an online friend in the UK named 'Dani.' Here, that's almost always a female name. Glad I erred on the side of caution and avoided gender-specific pronouns before discovering UK-Dani is male.

;-)

RSS

Support Nexus

Click to Buy Amazon items and help A|N

Advertisements

Heathen's Guide

Your Ad Here

Helpful Items

 

Search Atheist Nexus:
Translate page:
 
Social Networking Links:
 

Latest Activity

Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
11 minutes ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
29 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
31 minutes ago
paul babcock replied to Jessica's discussion Just an interesting observation
48 minutes ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Donald R Barbera's blog post Coming to a Head?
52 minutes ago
Nerdlass posted a photo
1 hour ago
paul babcock replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
1 hour ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
1 hour ago
paul babcock liked Loren Miller's discussion Morals in Men - Morals in Chimps - Why? (CNN - Kelly Murray)
1 hour ago
John Hutcheson posted a discussion
1 hour ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Jessica's discussion Just an interesting observation
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
2 hours ago
Andrew Fuller posted a photo
2 hours ago
Rachel Riley commented on Donald R Barbera's blog post Child Abuse & Religion
2 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
2 hours ago
Andrew Fuller commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
2 hours ago
The Flying Atheist replied to James M. Martin's discussion St. Anthony Falls Bridge, Minnesota in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
2 hours ago
Steph S. commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
2 hours ago
Tim Garrett liked Ian's photo
2 hours ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service