Does a religion require a belief in a supreme being? Is Buddhism, or Scientology a reDoes a religion require a belief in a supreme being? Is Buddhism, or Scientology a religion? The web site Dictionary.com defines Buddhism as a religion and Scientology as a non-denominational movement. Why aren't they calling Scientology a religion too? The definition of religion on dictionary.com seems vague. It appears that they don't know how to define religion, but know one when they see it which is why Buddhism counts as a religion but Scientology doesn't. Maybe it has to do with how long it's been around. The idea of Buddhism being an atheist religion seems like B/S to me.

Tags: Atheism, Phylosophy, Religion, Spirituality, Words

Views: 204

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There are different sects of Buddhism just like any other religion. Theravada Buddhism does not recognize a supreme being but others such as Mahayana recognize the Buddha himself as a deity. 

Also, I would say that any belief system that deals with the question of life after death constitutes religion. In Buddhism, you have reincarnation. In Scientology, people are immortal beings. 

Scientology is really bad Sci-fi passing itself off as a belief system, but then again, aren't they all?

I prefer to expand on a definition of the late American author, H.L. Mencken.

Religion is the haunting fear that somewhere, someone might be happy.

That's funny and true at least for for the Islamic religions. 

Whoops, I meant to write Abrahamic religions rather than Islamic religions.

Here is H.L. Mencken again.

We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.

Sadly, people aren't content to think that - they also want to use force, death threats (and sometimes actual death), etc. to compel others to agree with their biased observations.  Religious people, as a group, are incapable (due to being blinded by dogma, etc.) of being non-violent because that is the only way they can enforce their fantasies.  Here's a recent example in the news simply over a banner, a relatively inconsequential issue:  http://abcnews.go.com/US/rhode-island-teens-battle-prayer-banner-ma...

Of course, the majority mostly wants to enforce conformity to their hateful beliefs.

It isn't coincidence that that banner went up in 1963. School prayer was banned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1963.

The U. S. Supreme Court issued two bans on prayer in public schools. The first ban came in 1962 and the second was issued in 1963. The bans were the result of a court case sponsored in part by Madalyn Murray O'Hair. She was but one of the litigants in the lawsuit, but her name became synonymous with the case and the promotion of atheism. The ban not only outlawed prayer in public schools but it also banned Bible reading in public schools. 

The problem happens when he enters his wife in a beauty contest then becomes outraged that I didn't vote for her.

LOL!  And doesn't religion include the idea, as stated in The Devil's Dictionary by Ambrose Bierce, that one has 'invisible means of support.'

It's simple.  Religion is the infection, and jesus is the cure.  They're on "opposite spectrums"!

But really, even the wiki entry on religion doesn't help.

It's definitions like these that cause religious people to consider Atheism a religion.  

Atheism isn't a religion, but maybe there is one about adherence to logic and the scientific method or even some system of morality also based on those that most atheists follow.  But since we don't know the definition of religion, then again maybe there isn't.

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

Dennis Michael Pennington commented on blue pashmina's blog post Not believing in an afterlife does not mean i am a "sad' person.
"Living forever is not what it's cracked up to be. I'm not sad, but I do get tired more often. Imagine how sad and tired you would be after a few hundred years of singing praises and hosannas with God. Maybe it wouldn't even take that…"
17 minutes ago
matthew greenberg replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds...
"awesome finds Mel!  keep em coming!"
17 minutes ago
Dennis Michael Pennington commented on Wyatt's blog post Theists, Cargo Cults, and Logic
"I agree with Two Cult Survivor. The theist already knows that he is correct, and he has the evidence, the Holy Bible - the "word of God." The theist puts it on YOU to show evidence that God is non-existent and he walks around talking to…"
23 minutes ago
Akron SSA posted a status
1 hour ago
Steph S. commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
"Summer school starts next week for me."
1 hour ago
Pat commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
"@blue pashima. The woman being interviewed by Blitzer has a TON of class! @Randall. I tend to agree about rednecks.  Personal bias on my part, but the sound of Country and Western music is, to me, the equivalent of a knife scraping against a…"
1 hour ago
Napoleon Bonaparte shared their discussion on Twitter
1 hour ago
Napoleon Bonaparte liked Napoleon Bonaparte's discussion Liberty Fraternity Anarchy - Le Punk Francais (Podcast)
1 hour ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service