My oldest son just started Kindergarten 2 weeks ago. Before school started, I was at a back to school night and there was a table specially for the Boy Scouts of America with a scoutmaster and applications. I am completely aware of the Mormon and other religious influences, and especially the exclusion and predjudice of atheists, agnostics, and homosexuals. I was annoyed with the display at back to school night, but today my son comes home with an flyer inviting boys to join the Scouts, and the location is at his elementary school. It is a full page (front and back) flyer, but does not include the words 'god' or 'faith'.
I sent an e-mail to the principal saying I thought it was inappropriate, and cited the BSA's stances on non-theists and homosexuals. I intend to contact the cub master listed on the flyer as well. This isn't something I am enraged about, but I'm pretty annoyed. Is this something I should be louder about or have I done the best thing by voicing my opposition to the right people?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Torkoal (Gotta catch 'em all) on September 9, 2011 at 9:23pm
Permalink Reply by Jeremy on September 10, 2011 at 12:28am I think it’s more that he feels they are being disingenuous by not disclosing their religions policies and bias up front.
Permalink Reply by Jeremy on September 10, 2011 at 12:40am You should talk to the scout leader first, and explain that you want to know, IN WRITING, what their policies are, and if that troop actively enforces their exclusions of gay relatives from contributing towards the group. Ask them if, as an atheist, your child is welcome to join with the WRITTEN contractual obligation that no religious views or oaths would be taken by him.
This is great way to corner the scout leader into expressing his groups view on the record. From that point on, you can approach the school with an active record of their discrimination, should they take that course.
Permalink Reply by Doc on September 10, 2011 at 4:38am Stephanie, you pose a good question. As a small child, my father (nominally Jewish) was the leader of a boy scout troop, my brother was in it, and I was a (female) wannabe. That was back in the 1950s, when evangelizing meant letting someone spontaneously ask a question, welcoming it and the person, and then explaining.
Nowadays, evangelizing tries to look so benign when, in truth, it is subversively, unethically, and brazenly practicing "bait and switch." If your local scout troop prays together and does other religious things together, then it should be sponsored by and in a church, not a government owned, taxpayer funded property. Same for advertising, like the table you saw set up on Back to School Night. I recall the scout troops in my youth were all attached to churches, synagogues, and the like. They were separate from and outside public school. (You might want to ask the troop leader what church sponsors him, or better yet, approach the Boy Scouts of America headquarters, perhaps online, to see what troops are in your region and where they're based and sponsored.)
I'm no lawyer, but when a religious institution promotes itself by first appearing secular, and offering activities anyone might wish to enjoy, only to surprise its volunteer audience with un-expected religious doctrine, practice, and evangelizing, that's a form of bait and switch. One might also call it illegal advertising, based on the same principle.
These days, when Dominionist Christians do it, they're more brazen, so if you can recognize the code words, you know before you get into the situation, like the Rock The Fort situation (you can google). Moderate Christians are less brazen, and therefore more subversive, offering, for example, a free dinner for the community or free clothing or food for the poor.
Pardon the tangent, but this is why reBiblicans want to shrink government: Remove public safety nets from government, and the needy will have to run desperately to churches, where they can be better coerced into accepting Jesus. I live in Texas, and there's a tax supported program for addicts that does nothing more than turn chemical addicts into religious addicts who "jones" to evangelize, so they can get their next fix of acceptance, food and housing.
Permalink Reply by Craig Myers on September 10, 2011 at 8:30pm
Permalink Reply by Doc on September 11, 2011 at 10:35pm What if he replaced the word "god"? He could say "Mom". After all, growing up self reliant and strong could be considered as much his duty to you and it is your duty to him to give him the opportunities.
"On my honor, I will do my best to do my duty for Mom and my country, and to obey the scout laws...."
The vowel sound matches, and the consonants aren't so far off his peers will be likely to notice.
Permalink Reply by Jerry Wesner on September 11, 2011 at 11:51pm I'd suggest that what you want to do depends on how much fuss you're willing to stir up (and live with, as a family), and where you live. There's a huge difference in scouting between Northern California and small-town Texas. Before you stir up too much opposition, decide how important this is to you and your family.
Permalink Reply by George on September 17, 2011 at 6:42pm Margaret Downey, who has been an activist in this area for years, has written on this -
September/October 2010 FS Newsletter (pdf)
Articles: "Don’t let BSA recruit in your local public school!" and "Questions and Prep for School District Calls" (page 2)
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Halloween 1978 film critical themes and analysis ( please read)!
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Halloween 1978 film critical themes and analysis ( please read)!
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Our Political Need to Learn from Religion in the group Religion For Atheists
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Facebook in the group Hang With Friends
TNT666 replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Clits 101 in the group Secular Sexuality
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Dallas (on hiatus)'s discussion FS: My virginity mistake in the group Secular Sexuality© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

