Atheist Nexus Logo

If you had to choose a theocracy to live in which would you prefer? Personally, Islam would always be my least desirable option.

I understand that none of us would prefer to be forced to live under and submit to the ideology chosen by another person; we want that "none of the above" option. This question isn't about that though. This question is intended to force you to consider which religion is the most dangerous, the most detrimental.

American atheists seem to be generally ignorant about Islam and it's increasing threat, not only to freedom from religion, but to freedom of any kind. This is evident by the relative lack of discussion about Islam on the Atheist Nexus. If you are ignorant (which is no bad thing unless it is intentional) then I urge you to research the Islamization of Europe and the state of affairs in Islamic countries in Africa, the Middle East, and around the world. Below are a few resources which will hopefully inspire/incense you into doing this.

Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy: Inside a school for suicide bombers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoGJP02CtPA

Pat Condell on Islam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyNQ1zc-q74

Pat Condell on the ground zero Mosque
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjS0Novt3X4

I don't necessarily argue that we should be using the cold-war era tactic of buttressing the position of the church in the home and in the government. I do strongly argue that we should identify the greatest threat to our freedom and we should not simply speak up about it but act, with hostility if necessary, against any threats to our freedom. Islam respects nothing but force and if we continue to allow it to make inroads in positions of power and culturally then we will be left with absolutely no recourse but violence. Act now if you prefer a non-violent solution because there may come a day when that option no longer exists.

Tags: freedom, ideology, islam, islamization

Views: 570

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Paul,
Exactly what I was going to say! They sure are making up for it! They are younger than Christianity so maybe thats why you didnt see it before.
According to wikipedia Muhammed also had 'sex' witha 9 year old girl. It was one of his wives. Ewww! What the F is up with relions fixating on child mothers (Christianity) or child wives? Just sick!
Bit if a simple response. According to wikipedia thats what happened. I dont see you supplying any other proof to refute that claim.
Wikipedia shouldn't be used as a serious source of information. I had my own battles there regarding history (not regarding religion) and I know the environment. By the way, according to wikipedia, the birth and death of Jesus are historical documented events.
I've always found the English version of Wikipedia pretty reliable. Except for articles translated from other versions and that haven't been amended yet.

And the English Wikipedia article on the Historicity of Jesus leaves room for either interpretation (historical/myth).
Well I know wikipedia isnt that good but even Muslims say that Muhammed had sex with a girl that age. Thats just sick!
Until the West invaded the Islamic world

Yup. That asshole from Texas. What was his name? Oh yeah. Genghis Khan.

I expect more from you Danny than apologetics for a failed culture. The islamic world never recovered from the Mongol incursion. In fact, I would say the then and the now have no relation to each other beyond a common set of holy texts.
I would like to make a small correction: Spain was in big part occupied peacefully by Muslims. Muslims were seen as a solution and saviours from a very bad economical situation at the end of Visigoth administration. They were an enlightened culture for those times, they were very much appreciated by the European leaders and they contributed immensely to European culture.
About "Reconquista": propaganda is not a modern invention.
Werent the Indians at the time going through a sort of renaissance and invading Islam crushed it? According to the second article there were also genocides going on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquest_in_the_Indian_subconti...

http://www.hindutva.org/holocaust1.html
If someone put a gun to my head or my family's heads, I can fake any woo. I'm sure there's many people living this way around the world now anyway. Mine or my family's ultimate survival trumps principles. We only get one life to live. If I had a choice though (of which gun to the head), I'd pick Christianity. My knees can't take praying on them 5 times a day.
My knees can't take praying on them 5 times a day.
Just a hair of an elephent.
"If someone put a gun to my head or my family's heads, I can fake any woo."

Can you also participate in stoning the neighbor's wife for not dressing modestly enough, require your wife to cover her body if she leaves the house, give up alcohol, art, books, and freedom of speech? Can you fake all that?

The USA isn't in danger of becoming a theocracy any time soon. If Sharia law is instituted in even a small neighborhood though, as is happening in Europe, then hold on to your hat.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service