Bible isn't conservative enough for Conservatives.

(I was going to post this in Comedy because I was laughing so hard when I read it, but then decided this would be the best place for it.)

Aparently the Bible has become too liberal for Conservatives, and they have started a project to edit it to fit their own views of what "God's Word" should be.

A list of changes they are looking to make, from the project's site:
--1. Framework against Liberal Bias: providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias

--2. Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, "gender inclusive" language, and other modern emasculation of Christianity

--3. Not Dumbed Down: not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the NIV is written at only the 7th grade level

--4. Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms: using powerful new conservative terms as they develop;defective translations use the word "comrade" three times as often as "volunteer"; similarly, updating words which have a change in meaning, such as "word", "peace", and "miracle".

--5. Combat Harmful Addiction: combating addiction by using modern terms for it, such as "gamble" rather than "cast lots"; using modern political terms, such as "register" rather than "enroll" for the census

--6. Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil.

--7. Express Free Market Parables; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning

--8. Exclude Later-Inserted Liberal Passages: excluding the later-inserted liberal passages that are not authentic, such as the adulteress story

--9. Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples: crediting open-mindedness, often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels

--10. Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness: preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities; prefer concise, consistent use of the word "Lord" rather than "Jehovah" or "Yahweh" or "Lord God."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/05/conservative-bible-projec_...

http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

Views: 8

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I hope they keep the part about zombies wandering the streets of Jerusalem after Jesus' death.
Did you guys see Salon's satirical response to this? It really is fabulous: http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/feature/2009/10/06/conservat...
Did you guys see Salon's satirical response to this? It really is fabulous:
That is hilarious!

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

DAN DANA posted a photo
3 minutes ago
Pat commented on Loren Miller's status
6 minutes ago
Profile IconDAN DANA, nice girl, KOUSTAV GUHA and 3 more joined Atheist Nexus
17 minutes ago
Randall Smith commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
28 minutes ago
Trick replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Free Will [Sam Harris]
42 minutes ago
Trick replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Free Will [Sam Harris]
56 minutes ago
Sentient Biped commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
1 hour ago
Loren Miller posted a status
"Has anyone else noticed that A|N links to comments aren't working? You get to the post, but not to the exact comment. Something's broke!"
1 hour ago
Loren Miller commented on Bertold Brautigan's blog post Do We Exist?
1 hour ago
Lord Ainsworth liked Freethinker31's blog post We Are Not Alone in the Universe
2 hours ago
Idaho Spud commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
2 hours ago
Luara commented on Bertold Brautigan's blog post Do We Exist?
2 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service