Human beings are a queer lot! Every human society appears to be dividing itself like an amoeba! Religions, nations, political parties, any kind of human association seems to be running towarsd a split. Athists are increasing numbers, so we say and think. They are spread all over the world. Sanskrit language has a very apt description of human mind. It says " Pinde pinde matirbhinnah, kunde kunde navam payah!" Every pond ahs diffferent water and every man has a different mind. Atheists are a particularly difficult lot. No atheist will accept anything because someone tells him to. Domination by numbers will simply be rejected.
How are we going to maintain our unity? We must lay some ground rules to maintain our unity. We can not allow ourselves to stand divided. Any ideas how it can be done?
MADHUKAR KULKARNI.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on December 5, 2011 at 1:26pm Again, I wish for that "Like" button. Yes, Alice, I agree and like, "that's what we are doing right here right now.... :)"
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on December 3, 2011 at 9:55pm MK,
A common code of conduct is impossible; human behavior varies too much and too rapidly.
We human beings are too creative to allow anyone to write such a code.
You wrote "...a common code of conduct to deal with such differences, ...."
Please describe a couple of the differences that concern you, and describe how the code enforcers would deal with those differences.
Permalink Reply by Greg LeGore on December 3, 2011 at 10:18pm Tom, I don't know that a common code is impossible - we have one federal code of laws and various treaties represent a common code of conduct for human behavior across nations. I'm not saying we should or should not have a code for AN, just noting that it is possible to have practical rules of behavior to reduce misunderstandings and strengthen relationships.
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on December 4, 2011 at 12:14am Greg, you appear to have read MK's words for their intellectual content, and either ignored or didn't see their emotional content.
The federal code and treaties you mention have enforcers who will fine or imprison violators.
The common code MK wants will have no enforcers and therefore no penalties.
If you dislike metaphor, read my "impossible" as "futile and a waste of time".
Permalink Reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on December 5, 2011 at 2:44am Tom, You are absolutely right when you say that I do not visualise enforcers. We cross this bridge when we come to the bridge. My present concern is simply to eveolve a code, not a law, to deal with genuine cultural differences.
I also think that you should widen your vision. A time is going to come, and this is not too far, when half of America will be atheist and the other half not, half of Europe will be atheist and half not, half of India will be atheist and half not. All the atheists, all over the world, will need to deal with their counerparts in their own countries as well as in other cultures.
MADHUKAR KULKARNI.
Permalink Reply by Alice on December 3, 2011 at 11:14pm I agree Tom - I think that tackling the issue at the source is what's needed - what is the need that is not being met - then we can go about finding a solution.
Permalink Reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on December 5, 2011 at 2:29am
Tom. it is not correct to say that a common code is impossible. The cultural and political differences exist right now, today too, and there codes to deal with them. If we know something is likely to happen, then there no escape from it. People always find ways to deal with a problem.
MADHUKAR KULKARNI.
Permalink Reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on December 5, 2011 at 2:56am I too believe that the issue should tackled right now.
MADHUKAR KULKARNI.
Permalink Reply by Rudy V Kiist on December 5, 2011 at 10:15am Try this for "codes of conducts" for atheists; http://www.iamanatheist.com/rights.html
You can also check out the "16 things Christians need to know about atheists" while you are there. Maybe it'll help you Madhukar (^_^).
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on December 5, 2011 at 4:48pm Rudy, great! I would add, Take good care of your children until they are grown.
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on December 6, 2011 at 2:34am And then...?
Permalink Reply by Alice on December 5, 2011 at 6:23pm Rudy - LOL
Although I didn't choose of my own free will - because of course free will is god given..... I'm a determinist.... so it probably goes more like - they would be my rights and responsibilities once I've been exposed to them enough to remember what they are............ LOL

The Doctor Online

Richard Haynes Online

Summer Brashear Online

Sentient Biped Online

G Online

Loren Miller Online
Daniel B Online


Napoleon Bonaparte Online
Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 5 Comments 1 Like
OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…
ContinuePosted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.
I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 3 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this,
Nathan Young,
No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it. The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs. I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance. The letter was a mockery of atheism. Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 12:42pm 4 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this Facebook comment?
Nathan Young to Jason Torpy,
for once you and I can agree on something. We should disrespect beliefs that are untenable such as the belief that there is no God. Indeed for me to respect you Jason, I cannot respect your belief in non-belief in atheism. Your atheism comes across as arrogrance, smugness, and self righteous. Indeed after reading "An Open Letter to My Religious Friends" I penned one…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.