"Atheists have far better sex lives than religious people who are plagued with guilt during intercourse and for weeks afterwards, researchers have found.
A study discovered that non-believers are more willing to discuss sexual fantasies and are more satisfied with their experiences.
Both groups of people admitted that they carried out the same activities such as masturbation, watching pornography, having oral sex and pursuing affairs."
Tags: pornography, sex, sexuality
Permalink Reply by Glenn Pollock on May 22, 2011 at 4:58pm Yes we have great sex after we meet but being a single atheist male put one at a great disadvantage. The Free thinker Match website has 11649 male signed up and 3389 women. Not good odd for men.
Permalink Reply by Will Faithless Sophia on May 26, 2011 at 1:40pm
Permalink Reply by David Maxwell on May 25, 2011 at 8:03pm Actually I might beg to differ with you about atheists being the ‘only ones’ with a great sex life. Buddhists and Hindu’s are also known to indulge themselves in carnal pleasures, I’ve even read about Buddhist monks in Tibet, back in the day, who’d would come down from their mountain temples to indulge the physical pleasures found in the village brothels.
I mean let’s not forget that one of the best love texts from antiquity is the Kama Sutra. You can’t tell me this was written by a bunch of people with guilty consciousnesses. East Indian religions definitely have a healthier embrace of sexuality than those found here in the west. This fact was part of the reason why I took an interest in Buddhism many years ago.
Nowadays though, well, I’ve definitely moved away from eastern religious ideologies. Of course that doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy having sex. Of course I can certainly relate with Glenn Pollock about the availability of single Atheist Women. And with a ratio like the one he describes… almost 3:1 Sheesh!
Permalink Reply by Hambydammit on May 31, 2011 at 5:16pm Well since you brought it up... I can attest to this sexual repression... This guilt... Humans should enjoy sex as it is, it seems to be the main reason we are here. As long as its not degrading and the fantasy is mutually enjoyed.
maybe not in all cases then, this said after reading all the replies before me. Then again for the fundamentalist believers all i can say is "you can't miss what you don't know"... :)
Permalink Reply by Hambydammit on May 31, 2011 at 5:17pm
Permalink Reply by atmonauta on May 28, 2011 at 7:52am
Permalink Reply by Lorryslorrys on May 28, 2011 at 12:46pm I don't want to appear cynical, but any science journalism by the Dailymail is deeply suspect.
Maybe atheists do have better sex lives, but just bear in mind the article is from the paper that's main focus in science journalism is classifying all the inanimate objects in the universe into those that cure or cause cancer: http://dailymailoncology.tumblr.com/ ; http://www.badscience.net/
Oh and for all you daily mail fans (particularly those who use greasemonkey): http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/toys/dailymail/
Permalink Reply by Irina Uriupina on May 28, 2011 at 1:01pm Well this topic is mostly for fun )) I heard about Dailymail reputation.
I actually am skeptical to most of the studies today. If the subject is important, Im not only looking at where they are being published but who sponsored them and how the research was done: was it a simple cohort study or a double-blind randomized one.
In this particular case though, I think no study is needed to conclude that Christians won't have so much fun with sex because bodily pleasures, sex especially has always been viewed as giving in to lower instincts.
Permalink Reply by Lorryslorrys on May 28, 2011 at 8:00pm
Tom Sarbeck replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Top industries all depend on externalities in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Edison Sullivan replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Salvation Army and religious charities discriminating
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Republican Candidate Trent Franks and Tony Perkins Compare Repeal of "Roe v. Wade" to End of Slavery
Loren Miller replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

