From Psychology Today:
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Napoleon Bonaparte on September 12, 2011 at 10:11am "but one cannot change those beliefs on command." I agree on this statement from the article.
I see the nature vs. nurture discussed in the article -- That topic is still highly debated in Psychology classes.
From my psychology class (a while back): How much can be attributed to nature and how much can be attributed to nurture.
Permalink Reply by egan thomas penney on September 12, 2011 at 10:28am
Permalink Reply by mojo5501 on September 12, 2011 at 1:36pm
Permalink Reply by mojo5501 on September 12, 2011 at 1:19pm Thank you for sharing the article, Dave...this sort of information is encouraging. The idea that religious conservatives are trying to keep back the ever-growing flood of scientific information/evidence is pretty apparent. They seem to be promoting the unfounded notion that terrible and adverse consequences will occur if we don't maintain a creator belief in this society and across the globe:
"By creating a social and political environment where religion is presumed to be central to morality and patriotism, and where open personal secularity is seen as unacceptable, religious conservatives lower the likelihood that more will gravitate toward a secular lifestance. This is why they support laws, none of which were approved by the Founders, encouraging Americans to believe that they must trust in God (per the national motto), that the nation is under God (per the Pledge of Allegiance), and that we must have an annual National Day of Prayer. They want us to believe that America is a "Christian nation," because such a social and political environment strongly discourages personal secularity."
I will continue to see science as a philosophy of discovery, secularism as a philosophy of freethought, and religion as a philosophy that promotes willful blindness and keeping people in the dark. It's not that long ago in human history that mathematics was believed to be the work of the devil.
Permalink Reply by roland707 on September 12, 2011 at 10:54pm
Permalink Reply by egan thomas penney on September 12, 2011 at 11:28pm
Permalink Reply by annet on September 12, 2011 at 11:46pm If you have to force yourself the belief may not last. Kind of like Pascal's wager, "you are better off believing in god just in case he exists," is not exactly belief.
btw: Good article, thanks Dave.
Permalink Reply by roland707 on September 13, 2011 at 8:53am I say that is pretending to believe. That person would be going through the motions but deep down still doubting it's true.
Permalink Reply by egan thomas penney on September 13, 2011 at 10:20am
Richard C Brown commented on Hessenroots's group Useless Without Coffee
Joan Denoo commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
John Hutcheson posted a blog post
Ian Mason commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
Nerdlass replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Cicadas taste like asparagus in the group THE KNIFE & FORK
Nerdlass commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Some Wiccans and their seeking approval from Christians
Hiram replied to Hiram's discussion Epicureanism: a Secular Doctrine for Happiness© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

