Tags:
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on March 6, 2013 at 1:24pm Sorry, but COMPLETE BS.
Evolution is not a "purpose", evolution is the consequence of mixing and matching and survival of genetics over time, completely circumstantial to its context.
Permalink Reply by amer chohan on March 6, 2013 at 2:02pm Great, I never thought of that. Thanks for the correction.
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on March 6, 2013 at 1:54pm I had heart surgery a few years ago and I told the surgeon I wanted an ophthorectumy, cut the nerve going from the eyeball to the rectum so I would not have such a shitty outlook on life. I went to sleep with the surgical team and the team outside surgery laughing. What a nice way to go under.
Well, it worked. Going into surgery, I knew there is no meaning to life and no purpose. I woke up knowing that I breath air, drink and eat, poop and pee and fifty years from now, no one will know the difference. However, I have unique experiences and understanding about life and its foibles; I have nothing to lose being an activist in the interest of combating domestic violence, poverty, domination, oppression and exploitation.
I may not make a difference to others; I do make a difference for people I care about and for me. That is enough for me.
Permalink Reply by Tom Reeves on March 6, 2013 at 2:02pm That's hillarious Joan! I'm sure my wife would agree that I too could benefit some days from an ophthorectumy.
Permalink Reply by amer chohan on March 6, 2013 at 2:05pm Joan, you are lucky to live a life full of meanings, thats what makes you respectfull among us.
Permalink Reply by Idaho Spud on March 6, 2013 at 2:07pm Love that story Joan! Also like that definition of Curmudgeon. I just need to develop my humor more to become a card carrying one.
Permalink Reply by Glen Rosenberg on March 6, 2013 at 3:33pm I agree with greater message by TNT. However it is not fair to conclude beauty is perceived through cultural lens alone. Experiments indicate that appreciation of beauty is biological.
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on March 6, 2013 at 3:59pm The studies into "beauty" were not about beauty per se but about the process of selecting a quality mate based on symetry of facial features and suitability of secondary sexual traits such as hip ratio for females and V shape for males. These are measurable characteristics, beauty is entirely subjective.
Permalink Reply by Glen Rosenberg on March 6, 2013 at 4:04pm Okay TNT. I dont feel like engaging in polemics right now.
And again I quite agree with your take on purpose.
Permalink Reply by Napoleon Bonaparte on March 6, 2013 at 4:05pm La vie n'a pas de but et sans raison. La vie n'a aucune signification.

Permalink Reply by Jonathan Chang on March 6, 2013 at 5:33pm
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Rossby waves - what happens in the Arctic doesn't stay in the Arctic in the group Climate Concerns
Gordon Clay replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Joseph Smith's life before Mormonism in the group Ex-Mormon Atheists
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Countries at most risk from Climate Change in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists
Ruth Anthony-Gardner added a discussion to the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Boothby171 liked matthew greenberg's discussion YES!!!! Wolf Blitzer asked the wrong person if she thanked the Lord....
Boothby171 replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Parents Lose a Second Child from Opting for Faith Healing in the group Atheist News© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

