Tags:
I love zombies! Just kidding.
I don't reproduce myself John.
Educating others would be a purpose of sorts.
Permalink Reply by JP Carey on November 16, 2012 at 6:50pm right #1 is just 'A' purpose, and not a very high one at that. The #2, making your own path, is the real gem here, -educating others, turning people away from ignorance would be a great purpose.
Permalink Reply by Glen Rosenberg on November 16, 2012 at 9:32am TNT666, No offense intended, was only poking fun. Have seen many of your responses on AN and consider you quite bright. Was mostly poking fun at notion of having a purpose.
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on November 16, 2012 at 9:44am I had thought the same of you until reading your previous post :P
But pray tell, why do you start a new nest (nested postings) instead of replying to mine directly?
Permalink Reply by Glen Rosenberg on November 16, 2012 at 10:01am Technological troglodyte, I am. Only know of one way to proceed. You tree frog devil. I see the beast disguised as a comely tree frog. I fear parley with the demented demon satan. Arggghhhh
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on November 16, 2012 at 8:36pm But think of this Steph, a majority of atheists here are recent de-converts from religion. I can't tell you how many times, when criticising the society that has begath from 2000 years of religious thinking, I am told "don't throw out the baby with the water", because a great many atheists are still so attached to all the koolaid that they were raised with.
So hell yes, throw the baby out with the bath water and lets start anew. And those atheists who cling to religious values, yep, I will fight that as strongly as faithers, because if the only change in mindset is refuting Gawds, but the rest of the thinking remains similar, then frankly, why bother to fuss about it?
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on November 16, 2012 at 9:04pm Yes, throw out the baby. It has polluted the bathwater and will continue polluting it.
Babies (real ones) stir humane emotions. Only fearful people and charlatans use the baby metaphor.
When I was looking for a path away from Catholicism (55 years ago), I found skepticism and pragmatism helpful.
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on November 16, 2012 at 8:31pm Short and sweet, for all the reasons you stated earlier on, I'm a proud atheist, since birth, who refuses the word atheism. The "ism" is a suffix imposed upon us by moronic faithers who can perceive nothing else than "belonging" to a dogma. Because I was never taught any dogma at home, I resisted all dogmatic ideas that appeared to me through the years. I suppose refuting dogma is easier when you've never known dogma. A vast majority of atheists on these forums have only left god recently, and there's still a whole lot of religious thinking left in their ideas.
So there's not one type, or 10 types, or 100 types, we are individuals, nothing more, nothing less.
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
The Flying Atheist replied to James M. Martin's discussion St. Anthony Falls Bridge, Minnesota in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
Sentient Biped replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Sentient Biped replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Loren Miller posted a video
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Rachel Riley commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
Jerry Wesner replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Mathew T. replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.