Tags:
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on November 16, 2012 at 8:41pm Damien, you've written more than I can read, let alone digest, in one day.
I see hard atheists as having a problem: it's easier to change dogmas than it is to give up a need for dogma.
Permalink Reply by Dr. Allan H. Clark on November 16, 2012 at 5:58pm To my mind there are two principal distinctions between notions of purpose and meaning as they apply to believers and as they apply to atheists and other non-believers.This may just be another way of saying what others have expressed here.
The first distinction is that for believers, purpose and meaning are general and given, the same for all believers, as prescribed by God or by their church, while for atheists, purpose and meaning are individual and freely chosen.
The second difference is that purpose for the believer inevitably becomes a duty required of him, but for the atheist his chosen purpose, precisely because it is a choice, is never a duty.
Permalink Reply by Jonathan Chang on November 16, 2012 at 7:57pm Disagree. Purpose is freely chosen regardless of theism or atheism. Purpose is an imposed duty by definition, even if it is a purpose you assign yourself.
Permalink Reply by Dr. Allan H. Clark on November 16, 2012 at 10:41pm That seems to belie your positive assertion in a previous discussion on Naturalism:
Therefore, humans have no choice about what actions they perform.
Permalink Reply by Jonathan Chang on November 16, 2012 at 10:58pm That was a different (grander) context -- the bigger metaphysical picture. The choice I speak of here is an illusion; nevertheless, it is an illusion that is commonly understood. Today, the subject is more one of ethics: why should we (feel like we) do what we do? Is there a purpose? The only contradiction is one that is central to all the major questions of human existence.
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on November 16, 2012 at 8:42pm Therefore every single day we can change our purpose, because we are "free"... so why even bother using the word at all?
Permalink Reply by JP Carey on November 16, 2012 at 6:13pm Forgive me, but I don't see how Damien's post relates to answering the question at hand -Can an atheist find purpose and meaning to their lives? I churned through that ginormous copy & paste, and followed my nose on a few of the terms to only find minutia.
Was that a yes or a no?
I will say that the conversation is begging around a fundamental flaw of any so called "atheist group". To be part of an group that enjoys a negative. It's like saying "I'm off to my no-golfing club" -where we enjoy NOT playing golf, and we sit and conspire about how stupid playing golf is". The correct answer should be: I do not play golf (atheist), and I've found a better group (Brights, Humanist, ...) where we do things and make a difference.
This can be painfully obvious on this very site as we go back-and-fourth spitting about the theists
I too am guilty of this
Permalink Reply by Dr. Allan H. Clark on November 16, 2012 at 6:43pm The idea of a club devoted to not playing golf sounds intriguing—as long as the initiation fee is not too high and you still have a bar. Rich men play golf and tennis, poor men play basketball. The difference lies in the size of their balls.
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Rossby waves - what happens in the Arctic doesn't stay in the Arctic in the group Climate Concerns
Gordon Clay replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Joseph Smith's life before Mormonism in the group Ex-Mormon Atheists
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Countries at most risk from Climate Change in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists
Boothby171 liked matthew greenberg's discussion YES!!!! Wolf Blitzer asked the wrong person if she thanked the Lord....
Boothby171 replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Parents Lose a Second Child from Opting for Faith Healing in the group Atheist News© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

