Tags:
Permalink Reply by JP Carey on November 16, 2012 at 6:50pm right #1 is just 'A' purpose, and not a very high one at that. The #2, making your own path, is the real gem here, -educating others, turning people away from ignorance would be a great purpose.
Permalink Reply by Glen Rosenberg on November 16, 2012 at 9:32am TNT666, No offense intended, was only poking fun. Have seen many of your responses on AN and consider you quite bright. Was mostly poking fun at notion of having a purpose.
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on November 16, 2012 at 9:44am I had thought the same of you until reading your previous post :P
But pray tell, why do you start a new nest (nested postings) instead of replying to mine directly?
Permalink Reply by Glen Rosenberg on November 16, 2012 at 10:01am Technological troglodyte, I am. Only know of one way to proceed. You tree frog devil. I see the beast disguised as a comely tree frog. I fear parley with the demented demon satan. Arggghhhh
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on November 16, 2012 at 8:36pm But think of this Steph, a majority of atheists here are recent de-converts from religion. I can't tell you how many times, when criticising the society that has begath from 2000 years of religious thinking, I am told "don't throw out the baby with the water", because a great many atheists are still so attached to all the koolaid that they were raised with.
So hell yes, throw the baby out with the bath water and lets start anew. And those atheists who cling to religious values, yep, I will fight that as strongly as faithers, because if the only change in mindset is refuting Gawds, but the rest of the thinking remains similar, then frankly, why bother to fuss about it?
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on November 16, 2012 at 9:04pm Yes, throw out the baby. It has polluted the bathwater and will continue polluting it.
Babies (real ones) stir humane emotions. Only fearful people and charlatans use the baby metaphor.
When I was looking for a path away from Catholicism (55 years ago), I found skepticism and pragmatism helpful.
Permalink Reply by TNT666 on November 16, 2012 at 8:31pm Short and sweet, for all the reasons you stated earlier on, I'm a proud atheist, since birth, who refuses the word atheism. The "ism" is a suffix imposed upon us by moronic faithers who can perceive nothing else than "belonging" to a dogma. Because I was never taught any dogma at home, I resisted all dogmatic ideas that appeared to me through the years. I suppose refuting dogma is easier when you've never known dogma. A vast majority of atheists on these forums have only left god recently, and there's still a whole lot of religious thinking left in their ideas.
So there's not one type, or 10 types, or 100 types, we are individuals, nothing more, nothing less.
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on November 16, 2012 at 8:41pm Damien, you've written more than I can read, let alone digest, in one day.
I see hard atheists as having a problem: it's easier to change dogmas than it is to give up a need for dogma.
Richard Goscicki replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Natalie A Sera replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion New fungus killing cats in Australia in the group Atheist Ailurophiles
Joan Denoo replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Facebook in the group Hang With Friends
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Halloween 1978 film critical themes and analysis ( please read)!
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Halloween 1978 film critical themes and analysis ( please read)!
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Our Political Need to Learn from Religion in the group Religion For Atheists© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

