Tags:
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on June 23, 2012 at 10:44pm Since I left religion, I've read enough history to conclude that the people of Abrahamic times, with all the tyrannizing and killing they knew, found life so awful that they formed groups that fantasized a happier future life.
Their leaders occasionally found people whose lives were happy. Rather than risk losing followers, they demonized what made those people happy. This resulted in, for instance, Paul's saying "It is better to marry than to burn."
Over the centuries people rebelled. One metaphor for evolving, coming up out of the mud, has a lot of truth in it.
Re sexual hangups: While I was supervising volunteer sex educators at SFSI.ORG, I told newly-trained volunteers, "If you have any hangups you don't know about, our eight-year-old callers will help you find them."
Permalink Reply by Michael OL on July 1, 2012 at 10:18pm Tom, sexual pleasure - just as any other pleasure - is a fine reason to get up in the morning (or more appropriately, to go to bed in the evening), but it fails to qualify as a life purpose. As I wrote earlier, but perhaps shoddily, a legitimate purpose needs to combine three attributes: it makes life imperative, irreplaceable and beautiful. Good sex or good food may make life beautiful, it partially makes life irreplaceable, but it fails to make life imperative. The beautiful part is self-evident. The irreplaceability is only partial, because your sex partner might have just as good sex with an alternative partner were you not to have existed - or, she might not. The imperative part is completely absent, since people will continue having sex whether you live or die.
Shakespeare's life had a "purpose", as nobody else could have written those sonnets and plays. His work is imperative, irreplaceable and beautiful. But neither you nor I would be another Shakespeare.
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on July 2, 2012 at 3:21am Michael OL, sexual pleasure is more appropriate in the evening than in the morning?
To each their own. (To you, yours. To me, mine.)
Imperative, irreplaceable, beautiful?
I could attach any or all of those adjectives (and others too) to lots of things.
My take on WS's plays? Some very quotable lines buried in some very long fiction.
I prefer non-fiction, though I'm biases toward my own n-f.
Permalink Reply by Edward Teach on June 24, 2012 at 8:33am Existentialism is all about creating meaning. Here is a link to a discussion from the group Existential Atheists: http://www.atheistnexus.org/group/existentialatheists/forum/topics/...
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on June 24, 2012 at 1:19pm Thank you, Edward, for the link to the existential thread. A few minutes browsing it told me I'm going to spend a lot more more time reading it.
I first heard of existentialism when I was in college in the 1950's and its honesty impressed me most favorably. I learned soon that many college philosophy professors disliked it and even refused to acknowledge it as a philosophy. I perhaps cynically decided they disliked it because it made most of their lecturing unnecessary.
Again, thanks Edward.
Thank you Edward I will check out your link to Existentialism.
Right I agree JS you don't need mythical creatures to have meaning in your life. Life's meaning is what you make of it - exactly.
Permalink Reply by Alan Perlman on July 3, 2012 at 10:03am The wealth of replies to Steph's original question demonstrates very clearly that people are quite capable of finding ways to make this brief life worthwhile. Once you discard religion's false premise that NO meaning is possible without their fantasies and fairy-tales, a multitude of possibilities appears, and "meaningful life" becomes a non-issue.
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on July 3, 2012 at 10:14am I suspect that this whole question more reflects the arrogance of the hardcore christian point of view. This is represented by the whole "I am the way and the truth and the life; no man comes to the father but by me" bullshit. They have THE ANSWER ... and if you don't conform with their answer, you must be some pitiable wretch who does little more than survive. Their programming, their indoctrination won't permit them to believe otherwise.

Etienne Online


Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:37pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
There is a video of the Pope's 'exorcism' caught on film. The man isn't demon possessed, there are likely no 'real' demons. He's just delusional and doesn't want to accept personal responsiblity for his own behavior for his own dysfunctional life.
Brandi Amari Williams
Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:28pm 2 Comments 1 Like
There is an ad that reads ' Do you support 'traditional' marriage? Vote Now"! .
No, I don't support 'traditional' marriage because there is no such thing. I support heterosexual and same-sex couples marry each other legally , yes. 'Traditional' marriage promoters largely do not believe that heterosexual women are co-equal to their husbands. Their only purpose in 'traditional' marriage is to sexually satisfy their husbands if they can and raise children and do all…
ContinuePosted by matthew greenberg on May 21, 2013 at 12:18pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
i've got no problem with everyone saying "merry christmas" on christmas day. however, they've turned it into an entire holiday season where it lasts a month or more. in those situations it should be perfectly acceptable to say "happy holidays" or call it a…
ContinuePosted by Two Cult Survivor on May 21, 2013 at 11:30am 0 Comments 0 Likes
I posted the bulk of this on another thread, but wanted to add some context separately.
I finally confronted my faith and embraced the fact of my atheism late last August, 2012. Days after I revealed my "epiphany" to a few friends who knew me from another message board, my sister died from Lou Gehrig's Disease (which pissed her off because she hated catching a disease from someone she never f---ed).
THAT was my sister, understand? She was a beautiful, life-loving, potty-mouthed…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.