Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Deborah on February 15, 2009 at 12:34am

It was apparently alleged that the cartoon was a grossly homophobic image - they pointed to the depiction of Dawkins' wrists. In the opinion of the cartoonist, they simply didn't like the way that the cartoon depicted their hero, and the homophobic allegation was merely a convenient excuse.

The cartoonist was of the view that this a clever political tactic that is being used by an increasing number of groups i.e. to assert that what is being said is something unspeakable, therefore it should be unsayable, therefore you must shut-up, therefore I've won the argument. He thought that Muslims had picked up the tactic from the Zionists, who he said had been using this tactic for a long time. Apparently, every time he had drawn a cartoon critical of an Israeli politician he would be inundated with hate-mail saying how grossly anti-semitic his cartoon was.

The program also includes various other perspectives on the topic of freedom of speech and its limits.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by funk Q on February 14, 2009 at 1:33am

I like this question. I think there is as much a percentage of atheists who are nutjobs as there is a number who are what I call "orthodox". These are the ones who want every atheist to have their views and are quite upset with the freedoms others take.

As atheists are human they will have all the pluses and minuses found in any community. I guess some just identify with the label to gain notoriey, stir things up or mate with a person who evolved enough not to peel bananas with their feet. We just have to bear with this as we don't (yet) have the luxury of excommunication or being able to stone the nasty ones and scare others into submission. One day maybe...

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page