I'd like it if somebody experimented with the ingredients of religions to see what does what. I'd like them to perform the standard indoctrinational actions upon experimental groups of people (and a control group with no intentional changes, in case they screw something up consistently) with certain parts of the standard tales and rituals removed. For example, how it would affect the strength of religious followers' convictions if they've only ever been taught a version of the Jesus tale in which Jesus does not appear to some people after having died and respawned (no fish pun intended).
To actually get the complicit participation of the thousands of people needed to run this experiment would be impossible, of course. Alas, were it possible and not likely to be seen widely as objectionable due to the fact that those indoctrinating the others don't actually believe it, it would be able to provide great insight into which parts of whatever mythology is most effective to attack.
I suppose that in the real world we'll just have to read people's deconversion stories.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Joshua Chase on December 22, 2010 at 12:21pm
Richard Healy commented on Richard Healy's blog post Creationists say the funniest things....
Dust replied to Scott Bidstrup's discussion Psychology Today: The Fear of Atheism in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
Joan Denoo replied to Jedi Wanderer's discussion When is Murder justified? in the group Wanderer's Group
Write4U commented on Nate Julian's blog post New to open atheism, here is part of what recently allowed me to publicly affirm my beliefs.
George hawkins posted a video
Joan Denoo replied to Jedi Wanderer's discussion Fairness is Essential for Economic Growth in the group Wanderer's Group© 2012 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.