A Tad Hypocritical It Seems to Me: Fetus for Anti-Abortion Purposes But Not Liability

Views: 37

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ouch. That can't do anything but hurt their cause...

Even the One Wholly Cathartic and Apoptotic Church gets sold short by her lawyers sometimes.  ;)

Yeh, you never know when there's fucking lawyers involved.

Awwww, c'mon folks! Of course a fetus isn't a human when it comes to the Vatican's coffers. I mean - really! You're talking about some serious change, here. However, for the low, low price of 1,000 gold ducats, Rat Boy and his minions would more than love to buy a place for your voluntarily aborted fetus among the cherubim. And, for only another 1,500 golden coins, we'll get you a seat between him and JC. However, if sue us you worthless motherf&*%er, you and cellular goo we killed will rot in hell. Now. Go away, and quite looking at the man behind the curtain. Nothing to see here.

Why am I not surprised?

RSS

MJ

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service