You have a situation, the exact parameters of which do not matter.

You have a choice to make.


Choice A will CERTAINLY kill 15 people, and has the POTENTIAL to kill *UP TO* an additional 90 people.

Choice B will CERTAINLY kill 20 people, and has the POTENTIAL to kill *UP TO* an additional 75 people.

You do not know probabilities for these potentials; it could be only 1 or 2, it could be 65 or 70, it could be the full respective 90 and 75.

What do you do, and why??

Views: 76

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Megalomania blah blah blah...Jackpot !
Seriously? I mean really? You're 69 years old.

Also, I fail to see how my last post in any way demonstrated a desire to exert power over others or to convey the impression that I'm somehow important.

But apparently, you took the time to read it. Hmmmm....
Annoy is cause.

The theoretical does not take into account the moment. Nightmare coundrums and impossibilities are more for the Stephen King crowd and the superstitiously gullible.

People may break out their slip sticks and all but I refuse to postulate on nonsense.
Choice A.

Ceteris paribus, the mortality rate for potential deaths would have to be greater than 1/3 (33%) for both such that Choice B is preferable. However, given the smaller definite mortality rates, a 33% mortality rate for the remainder doesn't seem likely.

As it stands, in absolute numbers Choice A has a definite mortality rate of ~14%; Choice B has a definite mortality rate of ~21%. If that rate is carried over to estimate the potential mortality rate Choice A has total deaths ~27, Choice B as total deaths ~36.

More information would be nice, but given only the information provided; Choice A is preferable.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Future replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
55 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
1 hour ago
Michael Penn commented on nikki summers's blog post atheist billboard
1 hour ago
Michael Penn replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
1 hour ago
John Jubinsky posted photos
1 hour ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
2 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
6 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
6 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
6 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
6 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
6 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service