A dildo older than creation...

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Sean on April 9, 2009 at 8:11am

now thats awsome

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Фелч Гроган on April 9, 2009 at 8:19am

Just goes to show what a cock-up creationism is...

(somebody had to say it...)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Elessarina on April 9, 2009 at 10:14am

It's either that or on the second day God created a phallus and got distracted... haha

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rev Hellbound Alleee on April 12, 2009 at 4:56pm

That's great.

The NCW museum around where I live has several dildos on display, with no acknowledgment of that fact. But a dick's a dick; can't get around that. They're displayed as mortar and pestles. Grinding tools. Ironic, eh?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jennifer W on April 17, 2009 at 8:33am

i cant even fathom primitive technology on a dildo. Hurts thinking about it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Elessarina on April 18, 2009 at 5:40am

Not strictly true.. have just been reading about them

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klerksdorp_Spheres

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dre Smith on April 17, 2009 at 11:57am

Somebody call Wilma and Betty tell them we found it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by muhammad amer on April 18, 2009 at 7:30am

u r luckey to find such an antique. If ur hypothsis about it being older than creation is right then it must have remained in the use of "the creator". Such a priceless piece should be declared property of whole mankind.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by muhammad amer on April 18, 2009 at 8:34am

In my parts of world Didlos are worshiped practically. In India there is a large hindu sect which does "Shive Ling Poja" meaning worship of Shive's reproductive organ. Not far from my place there is shrine of Iben Shah where sacred wood didlos are hanging on trees for childless women to make them pragnent.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Elessarina on April 18, 2009 at 8:57am

Oh yes and ancient Egypt was full of statues are carvings of Ra with an eret penis, a lot of it was hidden and covered up in the past by prudish Victorians etc, but if you look around Luxor and Karnak temples you can find them, the regular tour guides don't necessarily point them out:

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/174/433899481_76549f14a7.jpg?v=0

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/2625525015_09c0487119.jpg?v=121...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rene Benthien on May 6, 2009 at 9:56am

lol I don't think most Hindus think of the penis when they perform this ritual. Lingam also means sign. So Shiva Lingum is just the representation of Shiva.

The phallic interpretation is probably not even the original one. It seem like it might be one that arose later from some obscure verbal tradition written down a thousand years after the original practice began, by one of the thousands of disparate schools of thought.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Karl on April 29, 2009 at 11:43am

When you wrote a dildo older than creation, I thought you were talking about George Bush.
I know its not related to atheism but this made me
laugh.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/08/01/man_auctions_advertising_sp...
its given me all sorts of ideas ;-)

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page