http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2020121783_apeuvaticangaym...
look at all the fat fux in the background.. the plague of the world.. sorry mah! ; )
wow that was a protest before the one from URL sheesh!?
not enough bells ringing for christ to drown out the true freedoms people want. and the vatican takes through gangsterism imho
http://youtu.be/ATW7E5ptViA
that's a real woman.. not a salve.
Tags: lies
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on January 13, 2013 at 10:44am Sorry if I'm a wet blanket, but the Vatican isn't going to take much notice of a couple women screaming and protesting in St. Peter's Square. If 10,000 women came and protested en masse, it might be a different matter, but in the end, I seriously doubt the RC church would change its position and for a simple reason: If they do indeed change at such a fundamental level, there will be demands on to change other things, such as women in the priesthood or approval of contraception or a meaningful reckoning on the priest child abuse scandal or too many other things to mention.
And the catholic church would cease to be the catholic church as we know it. And those in power cannot bear the thought of that happening. And so long as they can't, it won't.
Permalink Reply by Humble Pie on January 13, 2013 at 10:54am No, but perhaps four can give hope to eight, and eight to twenty, and twenty to a hundred. There are many, many Catholics who continue supporting such a terrible organization, turning their backs on the spread of AIDS due to the church's message, the discrimination against women and gays, and the subjugation of rational thought because that's just what they have always done. If anything is going to break their routine and cause them to think things over again, four topless chicks in St. Peter's Square might do the trick.
One person standing up for good can cause a chain reaction. You never no how many people you will influence.
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on January 13, 2013 at 11:12am Ultimately, HP, I don't expect the RC church to change at all. They've never been about what the people want or what they demand. All Vatican City cares about is what THEY want and what THEY demand. Any meaningful change on the part of Joe the Rat or his rat pack is about as likely as the second coming.
My hope is that, as the people themselves change, they begin to see the foolishness and manipulative nature which is the church ... and abandon it. As other people of other religions recognize the same thing about theirs, they also leave, but in addition, they stop giving deference to religion in general and organizations such as the RC church, which were once seen as bastions of good, but now revealed as overinflated boys' clubs, interested more in their own self-perpetuation than anything else.
Eventually, Vatican City will be seen more as a meddling influence than a beneficial one, and its dicta will be ignored or actively contested, not just by individuals but by governments. Its attempts to proselytize in ignorant areas of the world will be resisted as its standing in the international community is damaged. With much time and a bit of luck, the pope and his minions will be reduced to a bunch of furtive cultists indulging in intellectual masturbation over a belief system which no longer has either relevance or influence in a world which has outgrown it.
That's a long time from now and honestly, I don't expect to see most of this happen. And again, I don't expect the church itself to change at all. I expect PEOPLE to ... and as they change and the church doesn't ... well, I hope the result is something like what I've outlined here.
A guy can hope, anyway.
Permalink Reply by michele ricketts on January 13, 2013 at 8:42pm I agree the vatican cannot be expected tto last out the century but I think an adapted version of catholism will exist to suit the times and do just fine without a pope.As long as latin America is poor there will be Catholics.
My ex keeps going on about birth rates will plumett which means more share of resources bigger crumbs from the table etc....not so sure its that simple but for sure its not rights that erode the church as erosion of poverty and being poor
Yes, I would have to agree with Loren. The Catholic Church could care less about a few women protesting. They don't hold women in high regard. Women aren't allowed to teach or preach in their churches. There is no equality for women in the Catholic faith. Why don't all those women leave that faith? I just don't understand why they belong to a church who preaches that they are not equal.
Permalink Reply by Pat on January 13, 2013 at 11:39am Honestly, I'm thoroughly underwhelmed by this. A few women flash their breasts. So what. The reaction by most - including evangelical extremists that consider the RCC as The Whore of Babylon - is going to be either one giant yawn, or, "Look at those idiot females." Don't misunderstand. I think the point they're trying to make is valid. It's how they are making it. When the messengers look like fools, the message gets lost.
They've now got their Andy Warhol 15 minutes of fame, and by the end of the week, day, or hour, will fade back into oblivion. And, the RCC will continue it's medieval promulgation of fear, ignorance, hatred, and perversion. Worse, the RCC may even get some sympathy out of this stunt.
Permalink Reply by Earther on January 13, 2013 at 11:49am Who is responsible for the peoples safety around public protest?
Permalink Reply by michele ricketts on January 13, 2013 at 8:44pm Could be tiger wood's ex wife ha ha

Jay Michael Online



Kay Nuovadonna Online


Richard Haynes Online
Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:37pm 0 Comments 1 Like
There is a video of the Pope's 'exorcism' caught on film. The man isn't demon possessed, there are likely no 'real' demons. He's just delusional and doesn't want to accept personal responsiblity for his own behavior for his own dysfunctional life.
Brandi Amari Williams
Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:28pm 2 Comments 2 Likes
There is an ad that reads ' Do you support 'traditional' marriage? Vote Now"! .
No, I don't support 'traditional' marriage because there is no such thing. I support heterosexual and same-sex couples marry each other legally , yes. 'Traditional' marriage promoters largely do not believe that heterosexual women are co-equal to their husbands. Their only purpose in 'traditional' marriage is to sexually satisfy their husbands if they can and raise children and do all…
ContinuePosted by matthew greenberg on May 21, 2013 at 12:18pm 6 Comments 1 Like
i've got no problem with everyone saying "merry christmas" on christmas day. however, they've turned it into an entire holiday season where it lasts a month or more. in those situations it should be perfectly acceptable to say "happy holidays" or call it a…
ContinuePosted by Two Cult Survivor on May 21, 2013 at 11:30am 0 Comments 0 Likes
I posted the bulk of this on another thread, but wanted to add some context separately.
I finally confronted my faith and embraced the fact of my atheism late last August, 2012. Days after I revealed my "epiphany" to a few friends who knew me from another message board, my sister died from Lou Gehrig's Disease (which pissed her off because she hated catching a disease from someone she never f---ed).
THAT was my sister, understand? She was a beautiful, life-loving, potty-mouthed…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.