Atheist Nexus

The World’s Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

I often wonder do we write off certain religious stances when accepting the title of atheist? how odd is deism, to believe a god, or god like being created the universe but cannot control it past its creation. Scientist are already working on so called 'test tube universes' so why can our universe not be one of them, say a outside force initiated the big bang would it not be a viable explanation for the creation of the universe?

Tags: Deism, absurd, bang, big, universe

Views: 55

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's not absurd if it does not contradict known science, but as of yet it is highly irrelevant. I have enough things that affect my daily life to worry about before I get down the list to the creator of the universe.
Personally, I don't take being an atheist as an unchangeable position therefore I don't write off anything. But I do look at is as how probable is it. Is it more or less probable that something supernatural was the cause of our universe. If science proved that the big bang couldn't have happened without a conscious catalyst, or outside intelligent force then so be it. Although I still doubt that it would be a supernatural force but rather a natural force that we are as of yet unaware.

As for Deism, it's a non-issue. Being a deist is effectively the same as being an atheist at least in terms of how it impacts your life so I don't really see a point in considering it.
@Dawn K: No, being an atheist is not an unchangeable position and we have no need to add in a background as to why the big bang occurred however if we didn't try to discover the cause we wouldn't be very good as people who desire knowledge. Why must a god like creature be supernatural we may appear as gods to the undiscovered tribes of the amazon, does that mean we are of supernatural origin? A god is being of great power so if a person or persons created a universe through scientific methods they could be considered gods they are not however supernatural. And finally I think it is hugely important to explore as a theory, the Andromeda galaxy has no effect on our everyday life it doesn't make it any less worthy of scientific understanding
I think perhaps you misunderstood when I said "I don't see a point in considering it". I absolutely think we should search for the answer of why and how the big bang happened and didn't say otherwise.

What I said was that I don't see the point (for me as an atheist) considering deism. Perhaps an intelligent alien was responsible for creating our universe. That would be highly interesting and would certainly change our views. I am not a scientist so all I can do anyway is speculate, which while fun is not terribly useful. It is irrelevant to my life at this time.

And finally I think it is hugely important to explore as a theory, the Andromeda galaxy has no effect on our everyday life it doesn't make it any less worthy of scientific understanding
I'm not sure what you are talking about. What should be explored as a theory? Deism?
It was more of an add on to an earlier point, yes deism should be explored as a theory (along with all the other possibilities).
I have a friend who prefers deism to atheism. I don't see why. I think perhaps she just doesn't like the term 'atheist'. We both agree that there is nothing supernatural in the universe.
I have no problem with deists. Deism is at least somewhat logical.
they're the only theists who you can have a logical conversation with about their beleifs. most theists today are deist(at least the ones around here zack), with out realizing it generally. theres that huffy girl at crondelet my friend told me about who in some science class asked the teacher "why do we have to do this any way, because god just made everything."
not so bad are the ones with scienctific minds who still choose theism(though that is kind of ....weird) or at least who grew up in an environment where education was given proper respect, 'a moins equal with religion.
your mention of 'test tube universes' reminds me of the simpsons episode where lisa gives her tooth which is in a petri dish of cola a static electric 'zap' and it grows early humans then civilization. i think you might be thinking of multiverse theory though.

deism came about, historically, when modern science was barely emerging. because half of religion was intended to explain natural phenomena which humans did not understand, the first deists in a sense were moving in a big way for the first time towards logical athe/agnosticism, by recognizing those parts of theology for what they were.

donc,(therefore,) i'd consider deism quasi logical, respectable, et c. because it addresses the aforementioned, though not the thought control and fucked spirituality of chirstianity. (deists were all christians; it was born out of the western Enlightenment, so this is the context in which it must be considered).
Deism doesn't contradict with science, isn't dogmatic and doesn't make up absurd stories. Deism also doesn't impede scientific progress; so it's fine with me. Also, it really doesn't sound so illogical to me. Unlike Christianity, Islam, etc.
Deism is truly more benign than theism, and far less binding than any religion, but one would have to ask why believe in any god or gods in the first place? My theory about deists is that they learned about the concept of god from religion, primarily christianity, but disagree with the metaphysical claims of religion. They still believe in god, but try to rationalize his seemingly apathetic stance towards the physical world. Not too bad, but my only question is would they have any idea about god if they didn't know about the religious conceptualizations of god. Furthermore, if they grew up on a deserted island with no exposure to any kind of theism, would they arrive at the same conclusions. I think not.
While Deism is more refined and logical than most forms of theism and religion, I still do not see the reason to insert a god just because we don't have everything about the Big Bang figured out. First of all, this is just the god of the gaps; we don't know, therefore a god.

Putting a god in control of the Big Bang simply causes more problems. Rather than asking how the Big Bang occurred -- and scientists are looking for a rational explanation for that, just as they did with evolution, cosmology, etc. -- we would ask how the god created the Big Bang? How did the god come to be? Is it corporeal or incorporeal? Through what mechanism can it act or have intelligence?

By going to Deism, we aren't answering any questions. We're just making more questions.

James

RSS

Support Nexus

Click to Buy Amazon items and help A|N

Advertisements

Heathen's Guide

Skeptic Money

Sex and God

Humanistic Judaism

Your Ad Here

Helpful Items

 

Search Atheist Nexus:
Translate page:

 

Social Networking Links:
 

Latest Activity

Write4U commented on Richard Healy's blog post Creationists say the funniest things....
2 hours ago
Richard Healy commented on Richard Healy's blog post Creationists say the funniest things....
2 hours ago
shudan posted blog posts
3 hours ago
Write4U commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
3 hours ago
Chris Breman replied to Don Weller's discussion Better Luck Next Time? (a year after the NON-apocalypse)
3 hours ago
Joan Denoo commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
3 hours ago
Dust replied to Scott Bidstrup's discussion Psychology Today: The Fear of Atheism in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
3 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Jedi Wanderer's discussion When is Murder justified? in the group Wanderer's Group
3 hours ago
Richard Healy posted a blog post
3 hours ago
Don Weller posted discussions
3 hours ago
Write4U commented on Nate Julian's blog post New to open atheism, here is part of what recently allowed me to publicly affirm my beliefs.
3 hours ago
George hawkins liked George hawkins's video
3 hours ago
George hawkins shared their video on Facebook
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo liked Jedi Wanderer's discussion When is Murder justified?
4 hours ago
Rudy Ruddell replied to Elena Sandry's discussion "God" in the pledge of allegiance
4 hours ago
George hawkins posted a video
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Elena Sandry's discussion "God" in the pledge of allegiance
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion I Am Simply Speechless!
4 hours ago
Nate Julian posted a blog post
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Jedi Wanderer's discussion Fairness is Essential for Economic Growth in the group Wanderer's Group
4 hours ago

© 2012   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service