Love Dawkins, BUT I am uncomfortable with referring to oneself as a 'bright', it smacks of referring to oneself as an ALPHA. Thoughts?

Tags: Bright

Views: 45

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

In the forums with theists, I'm so tired of having to describe the difference between strong and weak (I prefer soft) atheism, agnosticism, pantheism, etc., that nowadays, I just follow Taner Edis' lead and call myself a non-theist (well, he says "nonbeliever"). I've never been ashamed of the word atheist, nor backed away from it in discussions, but it's a matter of practicality. There is too much of a vital distinction between strong and weak/soft atheism that needs clarification (and it usually makes a positive, tangible difference to the theist when they realize that the majority of atheists are simply "without theism"/soft atheists). For me, it has nothing to do with stigma. Perhaps realism is more unifying, but not all atheists are Realists- there are even (so called) Christian Realists!
"Perhaps realism is more unifying, but not all atheists are Realists"

Not all atheists are 'bright' either. ;-)
LOL!!!
I don't really have an issue with the term, although I prefer good old fashioned atheist for myself. I actually enjoy the shock and horror that cascades down a person's face from their raised eyebrows to their slackened jaw. What can I say? I'm just twisted like that.

My favorite thing is watching the wheels turn as they realize that nothing that they have been told about atheists meshes with the person they know standing before them. "But, you're a good person. I mean, you're such a nice guy, and you are really intelligent." I'm still waiting for the day someone says "But I've been in your basement and there is no altar upon which to sacrifice goats and small children." I know some of them are thinking it, but none have been brave enough yet to say it.

It has cost me some friendships, and has led to me being refused raises and promotions, but it has also allowed me to facilitate a drastic change in the way one of my coworkers views the world and the people in it. When others rolled their eyes or glared at me, she was genuinely intrigued because she knew me well enough to sense that she had been lied to about people like me. We would spend hours smoking cigarettes and talking ... mostly her asking questions. She has now taken on another term that I sometimes use, and refers to herself as a seeker. Damn, I miss that woman.
Considering the bad image that the church has created about us (atheists) I think "Brights" feeds into that idea that we feel superior to believers (not to say that reality isn't superior to talking to imaginery beings).
I feel it is confusing to have all these names - humanist ( a lot of people I know are not even sure what a humanist is), freethinker, skeptic etc. I say call a spade a spade - I am an atheist and the more we use this term the more people will realize that we are actually pretty much like everyone else - trying to live our lives as best as we can.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
6 minutes ago
jay H replied to Daniel W's discussion "Pope Francis played Huge Role in Cuba Deal"
8 minutes ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
19 minutes ago
Eclectic liked Deidre's profile
23 minutes ago
Grinning Cat added a discussion to the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
29 minutes ago
Luara replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Men not empathic partners in the group Feminist Atheists
38 minutes ago
Profile IconJoe Rogers, mike hunt, Sebastian Golat and 1 more joined Atheist Nexus
1 hour ago
John Jubinsky posted photos
1 hour ago
Jason Blair replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
2 hours ago
Jimmy McCann replied to scott martins's discussion IS EVERYBODY 100% POSITIVE THERE IS NO GOD?
3 hours ago
Joan Denoo added a discussion to the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
3 hours ago
Joseph P replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Men not empathic partners in the group Feminist Atheists
4 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service