Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Septic Sceptic on September 30, 2008 at 4:20pm

Take care guys- it's technically illegal:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/...

Section 333. Mutilation of national bank obligations

Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or
unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank
bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national
banking association, or Federal Reserve bank, or the Federal
Reserve System, with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note,
or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

http://assembler.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/display.html?terms=d...

Whoever fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the mints of the United States, or any foreign coins which are by law made current or are in actual use or circulation as money within the United States; or whoever fraudulently possesses, passes, utters, publishes, or sells, or attempts to pass, utter, publish, or sell, or brings into the United States, any such coin, knowing the same to be altered, defaced, mutilated, impaired, diminished, falsified, scaled, or lightened—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know the criteria for breaking the law is rendering it "unusable", or using it fraudulantly, but I wouldn't put it past the hysterical fundie hive mind to whip enough demagoguery that it impacted badly on the overall image of atheists. You just know that a story like this would get boiled down into a "four legs good, two legs bad" simplification, and be parroted forever as "atheists will happily break the law when it suits them", or "atheists want to destroy this country, look what they tried to do!"

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joshua1080109 on October 5, 2008 at 4:34am

look just be glad your aethiest because look at it this way, the doller bill (s) coins and everything will rot anyways, who cares its currency, now if it said something like fk you on the back then id question it even at that id let it go because its funny, who cares if it violates the constitution or not, in my opinion seperation of church and state, i find many churches inside states anyways.....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Roger Rotge on October 11, 2008 at 12:24pm

I think in some sense, having, "In God We Trust" on our money IS saying "fk you." It has that meaning not only to atheists, but to anyone that worships a god whose name is not God. Not to be too literal, but I would think it was offensive not just to the worshipers, but to the players themselves. So, not only would the believers of gods other than one named God feel like a big FU was leveled at them, the actual gods not named God are having a finger flipped their way just for good measure.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Фелч Гроган on October 8, 2008 at 3:28am

I found this a while ago. Its an odd thing, England not to suck -

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sean Lewis on December 30, 2008 at 10:58pm

Everyone should fight this bllshit for it isnt right to discriminate someone cuz they are atheist, or doesnt beleive in god.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Yellowtimer on January 9, 2009 at 4:54am

I think that it's a violation of separation of church and state, but I also think it's a waste of time to be petitioning to get our currency reprinted and our pledge of allegiance reworded.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sean Lewis on January 11, 2009 at 10:23am

Thats where the Amero comes in. lol

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BB on January 12, 2009 at 10:52am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rob Welch on January 19, 2009 at 8:25am

It doesn't bother me at all that the motto "In God We Trust" appears on our coinage & currency; indeed, as a numismatist I enjoy this quaint reminder of a crucial time in American history. It was in 1861 that a Pennsylvania preacher, the Rev. Watkinson, proposed to Salmon P. Chase, Secretary of the Treasury under president Lincoln, that a reference to god be included on our coinage (of course, he probably used an upper-case 'G'). His motivation for proposing this was The Civil War, which began that same year and which would cause more American deaths than any other conflict. To give credit to this preacher, the motto he proposed was not "In God We Trust" but rather "God, Liberty, Law." After eight years of an imperial president who spent most of his two unfortunate terms trampling all over our liberties and our laws perhaps it's time to reconsider the Rev. Watkinson's original proposal.

Anyway, three years later the motto "In God We Trust" appeared on the new 2-cent piece. In 1866 it appeared on the quarter, half-dollar, dollar and all gold coins. In 1909 it appeared on the penny (the first year of the Lincoln cent), in 1916 the dime, in 1938 the nickel and in 1955 it was made mandatory on all our coinage by an act of Congress. In 1907 Theodore Roosevelt oversaw the designs of new $10 and $20 gold pieces and he asked that the motto not appear on these because he felt it was blasphemous for 'God' to appear on money. There was a public outcry and the designs of the coins were reworked to include the motto.

And that's probably more than you ever wanted to know about "In God We Trust." So anyway, perhaps you could think of this motto as a vestigial outgrowth produced during a violent period of our country's history while our currency was evolving, rather than as a collective profession of faith.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tedster on January 19, 2009 at 7:13pm

I often have been thinking about how nationalism, religion, and war often are tide together. Even Stalin used religion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sneakerface on July 21, 2009 at 5:58pm

The reason 'God' money -- and chaplains in Congress for that matter -- are a problem is that Xians always cite these two things as proof that we are a Xian nation. "If we're not a Xian nation, how come God is on our money, and they always open sessions of Congress with a prayer?" They ask. That alone is reason enough that it is a violation; it misrepresents who & what America is.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by vjack on July 27, 2009 at 9:18am

It seems like there are two ways to look at this issue. First, we assume that "god" means some sort of god and is in fact a religious construct. Second, we instead assume that "god" has no religious connotation and merely reflects tradition.

The courts have generally used the second perspective in allowing "In God We Trust" to stand, but it has never made much sense to me. It would be like having our national motto be "In Slavery We Trust" and then claiming that "slavery" doesn't really mean slavery. We wouldn't stand for that, and frankly, we shouldn't stand for the god garbage either.

For me, the first perspective (i.e., that "god" means some sort of god) is the only one that makes sense. And from this perspective, yes, it should be abolished as the national motto for what was once a secular democracy.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page